United States v. Spy Factory, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the factor of expenses does not weigh in favor of defendants where defendants “have not demonstrated that they are financially incapable of funding their defense”
• noting inconveniences of a trial regardless of location and finding no evidence telephone and fax could not overcome the distance
• finding the location of events a neutral factor “[b]e-cause the criminal activity that was alleged to have occurred ... was concededly national in scope.”
• \ `[T]he burden is on the moving defendant to justify a transfer under Rule 21(b).' \
• \ `[T]he burden is on the moving defendant to justify a transfer under Rule 21(b).' \
• “Because the criminal activity that was alleged to have occurred in this case was concededly national in scope, the location of the events at issue favors neither side.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).