Skip to main content
· 1/28/1971

United States v. Sperringer

Citations

  • 322 F. Supp. 155
  • 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing plaintiff’s habeas corpus petition to review his parole revocation because plaintiff failed to exhaust his state remedies under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maxwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.