Skip to main content
· 3/1/1996

United States v. Spedden

Citations

  • 917 F. Supp. 404
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5004
  • 1996 WL 102368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that although family ties and responsibilities are normally not relevant in determining whether a sentence should be outside the applicable guideline range, a district court may depart upon a finding that a defendant’s family ties are “extraordinary”
  • noting that although family ties and responsibilities are not ordinarily relevant in determining whether a sentence should be outside the applicable guideline range, a district court may depart upon a finding that a defendants’ family ties are “extraordinary”
  • defendant was only one who could care for dying wife and seriously ill child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cacheris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.