Skip to main content
· 1/26/2015

United States v. Specialist CHAD C. ADAMS

Citations

  • 74 M.J. 589
  • 2015 CCA LEXIS 21
  • 2015 WL 346900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding reassessment appropriate, in part, because a judge alone sentenced the appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Headquarters, Infantry, Lippert, Devine, Staff, Advocate, Lind, Krauss, Penland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.