United States v. Specialist ALVIN S. BANKS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the INA “unequivocally mandates that aliens falling within the scope [of section 235(b)(1) and (2
• holding that the Ninth Circuit \misapplied the [constitutional avoidance] canon ... because its interpretations of the three provisions at issue here are implausible\
• holding that § 1225(b)(2) \mandate[s] detention of aliens\ not \clearly and beyond a doubt\ entitled to admission
• holding that 8 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e) does not bar constitutional challenges to the “statutory framework” of the 9 Government’s detention authority
• holding that 8 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e) does not bar constitutional challenges to the “statutory framework” of the 9 Government’s detention authority
• recognizing that under 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (c), undocumented immigrants are ineligible for release based on the commission of certain enumerated offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).