Skip to main content
· 10/4/1962

United States v. Souther

Citations

  • 211 F. Supp. 848
  • 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • documents protected by work product doctrine may continue to be so protected in later action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neese

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.