United States v. Souser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the district court’s error was not harmless because “nothing in the record establishes that the court considered whether the public could be equally protected by lesser restrictions”
• concluding the district court's error was not harmless because \nothing in the record establishes that the court considered whether the public could be equally protected by lesser restrictions\
• “Because an employer notification requirement limits the terms on which a defendant may engage in the specified occupation, it must be treated as an occupational restriction.”
• “Although the District Court concluded that this condition of probation would serve to protect Ms. Souser’s employer and patients, nothing in the record establishes that the court considered whether the public could be equally protected by lesser restrictions.”
• mandatory notification condition is an occupational restriction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).