United States v. Soto-Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that supplemental records may be used “only to determine which crime within a statute the defendant committed, not how he committed the crime”
• finding that the generic definition of kidnapping requires “more than unlawful confinement or restraint of the victim,” but declining to limit the generic definition to only the specific nefarious purposes identified in the MPC
• finding that the generic definition of kidnapping requires “more than unlawful confinement or restraint of the victim,” but declining to limit the generic definition to only the specific nefarious purposes identified in the MPC
• finding that the generic definition of kidnapping requires “more than unlawful confinement or restraint of the victim,” but declining to limit the generic definition to only the specific nefarious purposes identified in the MPC
• including ARS § 13-1304 in a survey of state statutes that “require a specific, ‘nefarious’ purpose other than merely restraining the victim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).