United States v. Sonner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating — while determining the parties presented neither reasons nor arguments for varying the double jeopardy analysis under the Illinois as opposed to the federal Constitution — that the defendants raised their constitutional arguments under both
• there is a double jeopardy violation only if all three questions are answered affirmatively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).