United States v. Sonja Yvette Osunegbu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants “have no standing to challenge the actions of the postal inspectors” where the seized mail “was addressed to and intended for someone other than the” defendants
• minimal expectation of privacy for private post office box because postal employees would have to look at and move the mail
• defendants had no standing to challenge examination by postal inspectors of unopened mail that was addressed to, and intended for, someone other than defendants
• in a prosecution for two counts of conspiracy to steal mail from the United States Postal Service, government effectively conceded that only one offense occurred because \two packages were stolen at the same time\
• in a prosecution for two counts of conspiracy to steal mail from the United States Postal Service, government effectively conceded that only one offense occurred because “two packages were stolen at the same time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).