United States v. Sonczalla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying LeGrand’s analysis of the Sentencing Guidelines to the Armed Career Criminal Act’s language
• applying LeGrand’s analysis of the Sentencing Guidelines to the Armed Career Criminal Act’s language
• conviction under Minnesota's 1986 third-de gree burglary statute qualified as ACCA predi- ' cate offense
• “We have noted that for a person to have his civil rights restored by a state for the purposes of section 921(a)(20), the relevant state must actually have restored the felon’s right to possess firearms.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• conviction under Minnesota’s 1986 third-degree burglary statute qualified as ACCA predicate offense
• “We have noted that for a person to have his civil rights restored by a state for the purposes of section 921(a)(20), the relevant state must actually have restored the felon’s right to possess firearms.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).