United States v. Solano-Cruz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Earley clearly established the right in question
• denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity in both this class action and a related action with individual plaintiffs
• denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity in both this class action and a related action with individual plaintiffs
• describing “the clear, core constitutional holding in Earley” as “that administratively-imposed PRS was unlawful and that if the state wished to enforce such PRS, resentencing by a judge was required”
• “The Court takes judicial notice of the administrative and state court documents submitted by the defendants . . . because the facts noticed are not subject to reasonable dispute and are capable of being verified by sources whose accuracy cannot be reasonably questioned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).