United States v. Small

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that D.C. Circuit has held only “that it is not plain error for a district court to have failed to determine the payment schedule for a defendant who participates in the IFRP” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Pletnyov
  District of Columbia· 2014-06-12· cited 3×
• United States v. Quigley
  District of Columbia· 2016-01-19
• United States v. Villongco
  District of Columbia· 2016-07-11
• United States v. Armstrong
  District of Columbia· 2018-11-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ward v. Chavez
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-05-08· cited 197×
• United States v. Sawyer
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-04-09· cited 94×
• United States v. Robert Morris
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-06-13· cited 40×
• United States v. Diggs
  Fifth Circuit· 2009-08-11· cited 31×
• United States v. Baldwin
  D.C. Circuit· 2009-04-21· cited 26×
• United States v. Joshua Godoy
  D.C. Circuit· 2013-02-05· cited 23×
• United States v. Rush
  District of Columbia· 2012-04-10· cited 7×