United States v. Slama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a court may, when necessary, raise claim or issue preclusion sua sponte although primary purpose of rule is for protection of adverse party
• in turn quoting Everett Plywood Corp. v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 244, 252, 512 F.2d 1082 (1975)
• “when necessary, the court may raise the question of claim or issue preclusion sua sponte”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).