United States v. Slacum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the first factor in deciding whether to grant injunctive relief is whether a movant can demonstrate reasonable probability of success on the merits
• stating that the Superior Court is “require[d] ... to hold an evidentiary hearing” before making findings of fact
• explaining that an injunctive relief may still be appropriate where the moving party makes out a very strong showing on the merits and a weaker showing of likelihood of irreparable harm, so long as the nonmoving party’s likelihood of irreparable harm is similarly low
• explaining that an injunctive relief may still be appropriate where the moving party makes out a very strong showing on the merits and a weaker showing of likelihood of irreparable harm, so long as the nonmoving party’s likelihood of irreparable harm is similarly low
• Furthermore, because courts of equity developed these remedies in order to provide relief that was unavailable in courts of law, it is axiomatic that equitable relief is only available where there is no adequate remedy at law.”
• conducting a Banks analysis to determine the proper injunction standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).