United States v. Sixty-Eight Cases of Syrup

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading Baggs to mean that unauthorized removal did not amount to a jurisdictional defect “inasmuch as the subject-matter was within the lawful authority of the federal court to hear and decide”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).