United States v. Simone Swenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that defendant was granted a continuance because defendant’s counsel was “new to the case”
• acknowledging that defendant was granted a continuance because defendant’s counsel was “new to the case”
• reassignment warranted where judge did not explain discovery rulings and attributed counsel’s mistakes to her sex

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).