Skip to main content
· 1/13/2015

United States v. Simon Andrew Odoni

Citations

  • 782 F.3d 1226
  • 2015 WL 150740
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no basis in the record for Odoni’s claim that the jury’s question meant the jurors did not consider all of the exhibits.”
  • mens rea standard for mail and wire fraud is “knowingly and intentionally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilson, Rosenbaum, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.