United States v. Silvio Spallone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this Court examines the “entire record for the purpose of determining what was decided” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that issuing judge’s “construction of an ambiguity in his own words” is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• noting that orders must not be construed “as going beyond the motion in pursuance of which the order was made” (citation omitted)
• noting that we review a judge’s interpretation of his own order for abuse of discretion but his interpretation of another judge’s order de novo
• stating the same Vicksburg language as Purchasers in analyzing an ambiguous order
• considering “the totality of circumstances” in determin- ing whether the district court intended to resentence the defendant upon the government’s Rule 35(b) motion and concluding that the district court did not intend to eliminate the defendant’s term of supervised release

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).