Skip to main content
· 2/27/1929

United States v. Silk Ass'n of America

Citations

  • 16 Ct. Cust. 566
  • 1929 CCPA LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an issue that was not and could not reasonably have been raised on direct appeal could not form the basis of post-conviction relief
  • holding that an issue that was not and could not reasonably have been raised on direct appeal could not form the basis of post-conviction relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barber, Bland, Graham, Hatfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.