Skip to main content
· 1/26/2024

United States v. SIEFKES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed, and all doubts are to be resolved against removal”
  • “Federal jurisdiction must be rejected if there is any doubt as to the right of removal in the first instance.”
  • “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed, and all doubts are to be resolved against removal.”
  • “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed, and all doubts are to be resolved against removal.” (internal citations omitted)
  • “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed, and all doubts are to be resolved against removal.”
  • “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed and all doubts are to be resolved against removal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.