· 1/26/2024
United States v. SIEFKES
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed, and all doubts are to be resolved against removal”
- “Federal jurisdiction must be rejected if there is any doubt as to the right of removal in the first instance.”
- “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed, and all doubts are to be resolved against removal.”
- “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed, and all doubts are to be resolved against removal.” (internal citations omitted)
- “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed, and all doubts are to be resolved against removal.”
- “Removal statutes are to be strictly construed and all doubts are to be resolved against removal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.