Skip to main content
· 1/8/2013

United States v. Sideman & Bancroft, LLP

Citations

  • 704 F.3d 1197
  • 2013 WL 71777
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 468
  • 111 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • quantum of information possessed by Internal Revenue Service regarding existence and possession of summonsed documents, together with evidence of their authenticity, satisfied “foregone conclusion” exception to Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
  • “We review de novo a district court’s application of IN RE TWELVE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS 5 the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.” (quoting United States v. Bright, 596 F.3d 683, 690 (9th Cir. 2010)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Graber, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.