Seventh Circuit· 2/6/2008

United States v. Shrake

Citations

515 F.3d 743
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2552
2008 WL 313190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Act is constitutional, because it restricts who may control the images but not what the defendant may introduce at trial
“The Supreme Court has held . . . that defendants are not constitutionally entitled to discovery It is accordingly hard to see how limits on discovery could be unconstitutional . . . (Citations omitted)
Government violated 18 U.S.C. § 3501(m) when they provided a copy of child pornography to a civilian expert because while the government had contractual “control” over the images they no longer had “custody”
the Walsh Act does not violate a defendant’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights
defendants not constitutionally entitled to discovery; federal statute limiting pretrial discovery constitutional
“The Supreme Court has held . . . that defendants are not constitutionally entitled to discovery. It is accordingly hard to see how limits on discovery could be unconstitutional . . . .” (Citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Flaum, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.