United States v. Shondolyn Blevins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant “has not shown that her post-Miranda inculpatory statements were in any way the product of coercive tactics,” but without explicitly stating that was the defendant’s burden
• upholding district court’s finding of voluntary consent to search where suspect was in custody but “coercive techniques were not being applied”
• requiring the government to re-file and re-serve after the dismissal of an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act, because this amounted to a “new criminal prosecution”
• providing background regarding Ms. 8 Blevins’s charges and affirming her convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).