United States v. Shirley Mora

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he prior acts need not be duplicates of the one for which the defendant is now being tried, because the admissibility of other crimes evidence depends on the nature and purpose of the evidence.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• “Relevance of evidence ‘is established by any showing, however slight, that the evidence makes it more or less likely that the defendant committed the crime in question.’ ” (quoting United States v. Casares-Cardenas, 14 F.3d 1283, 1287 (8th Cir. 1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).