Skip to main content
· 2/24/1994

United States v. Sherron K. Ballard

Citations

  • 16 F.3d 1110
  • 1994 WL 55012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge’s 17 findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Ebel, Carrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.