United States v. Sherpix, Inc., United States of America v. Louis K. Sher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing the “same construction” imposed on § 1461 to § 1465 “in light of” the statute’s “similar language”
• \It is a fundamental principle that a person must have notice of what activity is prohibited before he may be held criminally liable for his actions.\
• distributor of film, as an aider and abettor, was accountable for the conduct of another charged with the offense of knowingly screening the allegedly obscene film
• cases holding that Miller instruction for pre-Miller conduct was a denial of due process
• similar, with respect to a conspiracy charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).