United States v. Sherman Sharpe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant, having convinced the court that he was not guilty under one statute, was barred from later arguing that a second statute could not apply to his conduct because the first one already did
• “The doctrine of ‘invited error’ refers to the principle that a party may not complain on appeal of errors that he himself invited or provoked the court or the opposite party to commit.” (citation omitted)
• “The doctrine of ‘invited error’ refers to the principle that a party may not complain on appeal of errors that he himself invited or provoked the court or the opposite party to commit.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The doctrine of ‘invited error’ refers to the principle that a party may not complain on appeal of errors that he himself invited or provoked the court or the opposite party to commit.” (quoting Harvis v. Roadway Express, Inc., 923 F.2d 59, 60 (6th Cir. 1991))
• finding no plain error in faulty jury instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).