Skip to main content
· 5/13/1994

United States v. Sheila K. Smaw

Citations

  • 22 F.3d 330
  • 306 U.S. App. D.C. 21
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10607
  • 1994 WL 180111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a clarifying amendment “changes nothing concerning the legal effect of the guidelines, but merely clarifies what the Commission deems the guidelines to have already meant”
  • reversing application of abuse-of-trust enhancement to time-and-attendance clerk
  • reversing application of abuse-of-trust enhancement to time-and-attendance clerk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Williams, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.