· 5/13/1994
United States v. Sheila K. Smaw
Citations
- 22 F.3d 330
- 306 U.S. App. D.C. 21
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10607
- 1994 WL 180111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a clarifying amendment “changes nothing concerning the legal effect of the guidelines, but merely clarifies what the Commission deems the guidelines to have already meant”
- reversing application of abuse-of-trust enhancement to time-and-attendance clerk
- reversing application of abuse-of-trust enhancement to time-and-attendance clerk
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mikva, Williams, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.