· 5/8/2002
United States v. Sheila Britton
Citations
- 289 F.3d 976
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 8805
- 2002 WL 922106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- find- ing an intent to defraud when misrepresentations were contemporaneous with benefits received by defendant
- defendant claimed she “did not realize that she was spending clients’ funds or that her actions were improper”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Posner, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.