United States v. Shedrick D. Hollis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that protective sweep was justified where premises of arrest “was a ‘drug house’ that could hold ‘other occupants’”
• stating when reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress, we review the district court’s legal conclusion de novo and its findings of fact for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).