United States v. Shawn Richard Anderson, United States of America v. Mateo Morales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an error was harmless because the evidence was so “overwhelming” that “no rational jury could have” failed to find the disputed fact
• stating “the relevant inquiry is not what a theoretical maximum yield would be, or even what an average methamphetamine cook would produce, but what appellants themselves could produce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).