United States v. Shawn L. Poellnitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a court need only “be reasonably satisfied that he has violated one of the conditions” of a defendant’s release to revoke it (quoting United States v. Manuszak, 532 F.2d 311, 317 (3d Cir. 1976)
• “When the condition is that the deféndant not commit a crime, there is no requirement of conviction or even indictment” before concluding defendant violated that condition
• “In the normal course, one might expect that if the court finds defendant was convicted of a crime, the court may automatically revoke release based on the defendant’s commission of the underlying offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).