Skip to main content
· 10/20/2003

United States v. Shawn Jackson

Citations

  • 347 F.3d 598
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 21102
  • 2003 WL 22382617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing for plain error because defendant failed to rebut the government’s explanation for the strike
  • reviewing for plain error because defendant failed to rebut government’s explanation for strike
  • if defendant fails to rebut a race-neutral explanation at the time it was made, the trial court’s ruling on the objection is reviewed for plain error
  • “It is inappropriate for a district court to perfunctorily accept a race-neutral explanation without engaging in further investigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Gibbons, Sutton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.