D. Kansas· 12/6/1995
United States v. Shareef
Citations
- 907 F. Supp. 1481
- 1995 WL 746363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to charge to the government the delay caused by its legitimate appeal of trial court rulings
- “suppression of all the evidence in the case is information that may form the basis upon which a detention hearing may be reopened”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. HudsonC.D. California· 2014-03-10· cited 17×
- United States v. CosTenth Circuit· 2006-10-04· cited 7×
- United States v. JayD. Oregon· 2003-04-10· cited 3×
- United States v. BarnerW.D. New York· 2010-10-08· cited 2×
- United States v. StanfordS.D. Texas· 2010-07-07· cited 2×
- United States v. ArchambaultD. South Dakota· 2002-12-20· cited 1×
- Nunez-Dosangos v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2024-12-10
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
- United States v. Eric Millan and Ralph RiveraSecond Circuit· 1993-09-01· cited 118×
- United States v. Orlando Gonzales Claudio and Isaac Camacho-NegronSecond Circuit· 1986-11-20· cited 84×
- United States v. Victor J. Orena and Pasquale AmatoSecond Circuit· 1993-01-19· cited 69×
- United States v. Frans J. Theron, Frans J. Theron v. Honorable Earl E. O'connor, United States District Judge for the District of KansasTenth Circuit· 1986-01-31· cited 62×
- United States v. Carlos Peralta, A/K/A Jose MatosD.C. Circuit· 1988-06-07· cited 47×
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoFirst Circuit· 1986-08-15· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.