Skip to main content
· 7/17/2000

United States v. Shaheem Johnson, United States of America v. Raheem Johnson

Citations

  • 219 F.3d 349
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1470
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16931
  • 2000 WL 977398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting statements of a murder victim under Rule 804(b)(6
  • \[Defendant] murdered [the witness] at least in part to procure the unavailability of the only witness to his murder.\
  • “If the elements of the two statutes do not necessarily overlap, then multiple punishments are presumed to be authorized absent a clear showing of contrary Congressional intent.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murnaghan, Luttig, Michael

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.