United States v. Seven Packages of Tea

Citations

• 126 F. 224
• 1903 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33

Syllabus

<p>1. Seizures — Statutes—Constitutionality—Objections—Estoppel.</p> <p>Where certain tea was seized, on reimportation, the importer was not estopped to claim that the statute under which the seizure was made was unconstitutional, by reason of the fact that, on a former seizure of the tea on original importation under the same statute, he had given a bond to carry the tea out of the country, and not reimport it</p>