United States v. Seven Large Fermenting Tubs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the testimony of a single witness can be sufficient to prove a perpetrator’s identity beyond a reasonable doubt
• noting that this Court will not grant greater relief on appeal than was sought at trial, in the absence of a cross-appeal (citing Better Bldg. Maint. of the V.I., Inc. v. Lee, 60 V.I. 740, 761-62 (V.I. 2014))
• noting failure to cite controlling authority despite obligation to do so under Supreme Court Rule 15(b)
• affirming the grant of a new trial “in the interest of justice”
• affirming the grant of a new trial ‘in the interest of justice’
• appellate court will neither grant a litigant relief not sought at trial, nor greater relief than what was sought at trial, in the absence of a cross-appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).