United States v. Serrano-Berrios

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \the district court needed to 'articulate[] why it believed [the defendant's] case differed from the norm'\ (first alteration in original
• vacating sentence in part due to a failure to explain a ten-month increase over top of guidelines range
• remanding for clarification when it was \unclear what the court meant by\ a statement that was open to multiple interpretations and not clearly tethered to the sentencing record
• finding revocation sentencing rationale inadequate where the same language was used
• first quoting United States v. Del Valle-Rodríguez, 761 F.3d 171, 177 (1st Cir. 2014); and then quoting Rivera-Berríos, 968 F.3d at 136

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).