United States v. Septon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court did not err by applying the sophisticated-means enhancement where a scheme involved “submitting numerous loan applications to lenders containing forged signatures, forged notary stamps, and falsified or altered [documents]”
• finding that “an arms-length commercial relationship will ordinarily not suffice for the [abuse-of-trust] enhancement to apply”
• finding that “an arms-length commercial relationship will ordinarily not suffice for the [abuse-of-trust] enhancement to apply”
• “[A]n arms-length commercial relationship will ordinarily not suffice for the [abuse-of-trust] enhancement to apply . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).