United States v. Seppa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding denomination of motion rather than notice is \without legal significance since the effect desired ... was clearly to have [plaintiff's] claims dismissed without prejudice\
• finding that notice of voluntary dismissal mooted prior-filed motion to dismiss
• “Although the document filed . . . was denominated a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal rather than a notice of dismissal as specified in Rule 41(a)(1
• fact that plaintiff styled 2 document “Motion for Voluntary Dismissal” rather than notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).