Skip to main content
· 8/24/2001

United States v. Seng Xiong

Citations

  • 262 F.3d 672
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19148
  • 2001 WL 964700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “disparaging remarks directed at defense counsel are reprehensible”
  • denying new trial where prosecutor stated: “What [counsel] is telling you, ladies and gentlemen, is that you should never convict somebody in this type of conspiracy” (alteration in original)
  • prosecutor may comment on weakness of defendant’s case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Evans, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.