United States v. Seifullah Muhammad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant’s cryptic reference to “an attorney” did not constitute an unambiguous request for counsel
• defendant is not entitled to an agent’s notes if the report contains all that was in the notes
• suspect made “cryptic reference to ‘an attorney,’ ” declined opportunity to call one, and then executed waiver
• “The . . . Blockburger test directs our analysis in this regard.”
• “This ‘flexible, commonsense’ probable cause standard rests on whether a ‘man of reasonable caution’ would believe that the accused has committed a crime; it does not require that this ‘belief be correct or more likely true than false.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).