United States v. Sed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a seizure by Pennsylvania state police was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment even though it took place in Ohio
• rejecting a sentencing factor manipulation claim where law enforcement had arranged a second drug deal, thereby increasing the defendant’s sentence
• “In light of , Sed is plainly wrong when he argues that his arrest in violation of Ohio law renders the conduct of the [Pennsylvania] State Police unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.”
• upholding a conviction and sentence from a controlled purchase
• describing the variation across courts of appeals
• describing the variation across courts of appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).