United States v. Sean Robert Mulloy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Parke v. Raley, 506 U.S. 20, 113 S.Ct. 517, 121 L.Ed.2d 391 (1992), accords a “presumption of regularity” to prior convictions offered for purposes of sentence enhancement
• noting that the presumption of regularity which attaches to final judgments cannot be overcome \merely by pointing to a silent or ambiguous record\
• explaining that Boykin’s presumption of invalidity does not apply on collateral review
• affidavits from the prosecutor and defense counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).