United States v. Sean Francis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relating with approval district court’s characterization of respondent’s conformance with the law for more than seven months on release as “compelling evidence” of his volitional control
• “A court commits clear error when it makes findings without properly taking into account substantial evidence to the contrary.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “A court commits clear error when it makes findings without properly taking into account substantial evidence to the contrary.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “A court commits clear error when it makes findings without properly taking into account substantial evidence to the contrary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).