United States v. Scott Nielsen

Oral argument

• Argued

  30 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was “strong indication that the Nevada Supreme Court would find fiduciary obligations between shareholders in a corporation such as FFUSA operated by shareholder-directors”
• holding that there was ''strong indication that the Nevada Supreme Court would find fiduciary obligations between shareholders in a corporation such as FFUSA operated by shareholder· djrectors''
• holding the presumptive valuation date on a freeze-out claim to be the date of filing the suit
• noting that Donahue’s “recognition of special rules of fiduciary duty applicable to close corporations has gained widespread acceptance”
• noting that definitions of minority shareholder oppression usually take one of these three forms
• looking to the law of other jurisdictions because Nevada had not addressed the relevant issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).