United States v. Scott M. Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he whole plea agreement stands, or the whole thing falls,” in response to a defendant’s argument regarding the validity of a restitu- tion order imposed pursuant to a plea agreement
• upholding the restitution order and plea agreement under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(3
• “Peterson does not contend that the judge’s calculation was mistaken; he argues only that the district judge lacked authority to specify any amount.”
• where the defendant agreed to make restitution to victims and agreed that “the district judge could make decisions that proved necessary to implement this choice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).