Skip to main content
· 6/7/1985

United States v. Scott Gordon Duncan

Citations

  • 763 F.2d 220
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 19752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • drug possession case: no due process violation unless both prejudice and intent proven, no prejudice shown from loss of potentially favorable witness
  • claim that delay resulted in former girlfriend’ s refusal to testify not sufficiently prejudicial to justify dismissal because no indication former girlfriend would aid defense
  • the admittedly real possibilities that memories will dim, witnesses will become inaccessible, and evidence will be lost are insufficient, in themselves, to demonstrate that a defendant cannot receive a fair trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wellford, Milburn, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.