Skip to main content
· 10/2/2000

United States v. Scott David Upshaw

Citations

  • 226 F.3d 1101
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8098
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 10741
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 24495
  • 2000 WL 1455891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, if a fact is a necessary element of the crime of conviction, that fact is sufficiently established to support a sentencing enhancement
  • “Given the basis for our resolution of this appeal, we need not decide what standard of review applies. Under either standard, we affirm the district court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Nelson, Silverman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.