· 10/2/2000
United States v. Scott David Upshaw
Citations
- 226 F.3d 1101
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8098
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 10741
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 24495
- 2000 WL 1455891
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, if a fact is a necessary element of the crime of conviction, that fact is sufficiently established to support a sentencing enhancement
- “Given the basis for our resolution of this appeal, we need not decide what standard of review applies. Under either standard, we affirm the district court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Nelson, Silverman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.